Sunday, September 27, 2009

On Influence

The subject of influence has been a big one for me lately. There are a number of questions that I have been asking myself that I would like to throw open to all of my fellow musicians/artists/thinking individuals.


It seems that we spend our early, formative years as artists assimilating information from many different sources. For jazz musicians, such as myself, this tends to consist of listening to records by the greats, figuring out whose sound you like, and learning how to imitate those sounds. There have been countless musicians who have made great impressions on me, and whose work has affected the way I approach music. To become an artist, one must be able to synthesize all these sources and put them to use in creating original art.


An anecdote: In my first week here at Oberlin, I attended a jam session with some of the other jazz students here. While I was waiting for things to get started, I sat down at the piano to play a little bit. Without thinking much, I dove into a modal improvisation, using typical McCoy Tyner-style stacked fourth chords. Another musician heard me and said something to the effect of "It's good to have a McCoy Tyner guy hear, everyone else is into Bill Evans." I know he meant it as a compliment, but it raised a lot of problems for me. Certainly we don't train ourselves as musicians (or in any other discipline) merely to fit into one established school of playing. I don't want to be identified as a Bill Evans follower or a McCoy Tyner follower or any such bullshit. I must admit though, that a lot of this was on me. I had essentially sat down to the piano on that particular occasion and intentionally decided to imitate McCoy Tyner. I could not deny the influence that he has had on my playing, but I don't want to let myself fall into something like "Okay, now I'm doing my McCoy thing, now I'm doing my Herbie thing, now I'm doing my Cecil thing. "


The problem that I now confront is how to synthesize these influences into one cohesive approach to making music. How do I use the things I learned from Mccoy Tyner, Bill Evans, Herbie Hancock, Cecil Taylor and everyone else all at once, without sounding like any of those people?


This gets even more problematic if you view influence in broader wider terms. There are a lot of figures outside of jazz who are equally important to my music. Composers such as John Adams and Morton Feldman, for example have had a huge impact on me. How can I reflect this in my approach to playing jazz?


I know that I am not the first person to raise these questions. Nor are they questions that necessarily have answers. Perhaps this synthesis of styles and influences is a process that one undergoes innately as one continues to study. In any case, recently it has felt necessary for me to put more deliberate and conscious thought into the matter. So anyway, I'd love to here all of your feedback, anecdotes, asides or completely unrelated comments.

Friday, September 11, 2009

I have been too busy to do any proper writing lately.  This will hopefully change eventually.


The Experimental Music Collective (for more on this read Doug's july 20th post over at stainonsilence.blogspot.com) has regrouped in Oberlin with several new members.  Besides the warm fuzzy feeling it gives me to see our little family grow, there are a lot of new possibilities and challenges that this expanded line-up brings.  In freely improvised music, a greater number of musicians calls for even greater levels of focus, self-control and communication amongst all involved.  The larger ensemble means a greater number of ideas are brought to the musical table.  Although this is clearly a good thing, it can also make it more difficult to find a common ground in an improvisation.   Think of how two people can carry on a continuous and thoughtful conversation while absorbing everything the other person says.  If there are say, seven people in the room, the conversation can split into factions, and topics of discussion sway uneasily and chaotically. 


Nevertheless, the challenge has been a welcome one for all of us.  This Sunday, a somewhat reduced version of the collective convened for what has been one of our best meetings.  The music had a level of continuity which had been very elusive.  This had been the subject of an argument amongst several of us over the summer, whether "form" and "continuity" were possible or desirable in this type of music.  On this particular night though, there seemed to be a natural flow in the transition between various sections of the music.  Solos and duets emerged naturally out of the ensemble for very effective contrasts.  It was a very satisfying night of music.  


Hopefully there is much more of this to come.